logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Post a reply
From:
Message:

Maximum number of characters in each post is: 32767
Bold Italic Underline   Highlight Quote Choose Language for Syntax Highlighting Insert Image Insert an existing Attachment or upload a new File... Create Link   Unordered List Ordered List   Left Justify Center Justify Right Justify   Outdent Indent   More BBCode Tags
Font Color Font Size
Security Image:
Enter The Letters From The Security Image:
  Preview Post Cancel

Last 10 Posts (In reverse order)
Inco Posted: Thursday, June 21, 2018 4:53:19 AM(UTC)
 
Thank you for your work on the rendering issue Paul and the team.

Any update on this question ?
I'm just looking for confirmation or pointers. Is inheriting _startPage and _endPage the way to go ?
Inco Posted: Sunday, June 10, 2018 6:06:45 AM(UTC)
 
Originally Posted by: Paul Rayman Go to Quoted Post
What view mode should support this behavior?
Should it be SinglePageView, VerticalView, HorizontalView or each of them?


SinglePageView and VerticalView minimum.
HorizontalView is a plus.
Paul Rayman Posted: Sunday, June 10, 2018 4:58:59 AM(UTC)
 
What view mode should support this behavior?
Should it be SinglePageView, VerticalView, HorizontalView or each of them?
Inco Posted: Saturday, June 9, 2018 2:38:31 AM(UTC)
 
Hi,

What would be the optimal way, performance-wise, to work with Subset of pages as far PdfViewer is concerned ?

The subset would always be contiguous, e.g. Page 32-128. From the user perspective, only that Subset exists.
Some PDFs might be in the few 100s of MB, so extracting spans of pages to file is out of the question, it should be in-memory.

Bearing in mind I am just getting acquainted with Pdfium, so far I have considered the following strategies:
  • Inherit _startPage and _endPage
  • ImportPages in a new virtual Document (seems performance-unfriendly)


Alex

Privacy Policy | Powered by YAF.NET 2.24.20 | YAF.NET © 2003-2026, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.